What Changed and Why#
Before Oct 2023: Foreign sellers could designate any Japanese company as their Importer of Record (IOR) — even companies with zero interest in the goods.
After Oct 2023: The actual owner of the goods must be the IOR. If that owner isn't in Japan, they need an ACP to make it work.
🔵 Before Oct 2023
🔴 After Oct 2023
Third-party IOR
✅ Widely used
❌ Prohibited in most cases
Non-resident as IOR
❌ Not directly possible
✅ Via ACP appointment
Importer definition
Loosely interpreted
Person with disposition rights (処分権限)
JCT deduction
Often lost to nominee
✅ Preserved via ACP/IOR
📌 Official Source: Japan Customs — ACP Leaflet (English)
What Is an ACP?# The Attorney for Customs Procedures (税関事務管理人) is defined under Article 95 of the Customs Act :
A person without address, residence, or office in Japan who intends to engage in customs procedures shall appoint a Japanese-resident agent.
KEY DISTINCTION:
ACP ≠ Importer
ACP = Procedural agent that ENABLES the non-resident to BE the importer
┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Non-Resident │ appoints │ ACP │ liaises │Japan Customs │
│ Entity │────────→│ (JP Resident)│────────→│ (税関) │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ = The IMPORTER │ │ = The AGENT │ │ = Authority │
│ (owns goods, │ │ (handles │ │ │
│ pays taxes) │ │ paperwork) │ │ │
└──────────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
Aplash Services
Need a compliant Japan import structure?
Aplash acts as your Attorney for Customs Procedures (ACP) so your company can import in its own name without a Japan entity.
Explore ACP (Trade) → Why the Old System Was Banned# Japan Customs identified systemic problems with the third-party IOR model:
Problem
Impact
🔻 Customs valuation fraud
Non-residents provided artificially low invoices → underpaid duties & JCT
❓ Compliance gaps
Nominee importers couldn't answer questions about goods during audits
💸 Tax leakage
JCT on domestic sales not properly reported/remitted
📋 No accountability
Nominee IOR had no real interest in the goods → no incentive to ensure compliance
The reform's core principle: the entity that controls the goods must be the entity that takes legal responsibility for them.
How ACP Works — Step by Step# Setup Process
Step
Action
Timeline
1
Engage ACP provider; sign service agreement
1–2 weeks
2
ACP files notification (届出) with Customs office
~2 weeks
3
Registration confirmed; import operations begin
Immediately
Total setup time
~3–4 weeks
Ongoing Import Flow 1. Non-resident ships goods to Japan
│
2. Freight forwarder handles logistics
│
3. Customs broker files import declaration
── names non-resident as IOR ──
│
4. ACP coordinates with broker + Customs
│
5. Duties + JCT assessed and paid
(via ACP's bank account since 2024)
│
6. Goods released for domestic distribution
│
7. ACP maintains records per Art. 95
ACP Service Scope#
Service
Description
📋 ACP Registration
Filing + maintaining notification with Japan Customs
🤝 Liaison
Coordinate with customs brokers, forwarders, Customs offices
📄 Documentation
Prepare/review commercial invoices, shipping docs, declarations
💰 Customs Valuation
Calculate correct value per Tariff Customs Act
🏷️ HS Classification
Determine appropriate tariff code
⚖️ Advance Rulings
Apply for binding rulings on classification, valuation, origin
🛡️ Regulated Products
PSE/PSC (Product Safety), Food Sanitation Act, Radio Act compliance
📦 Record Keeping
Maintain import/export records per Customs Act requirements
🔒 Security Export Control
List Control + Catch-All Control under FEFTA
The JCT Connection — Where Real Money Is at Stake# The Math
Step
Amount
Who Pays
① Import
10% JCT on customs value
IOR pays to Customs
② Domestic sale
10% JCT on sale price
Customer pays to seller
③ JCT Filing
Output JCT ② − Input JCT ① = Net payable
IOR/seller files return
Impact Comparison
Scenario
Annual Imports ¥100M
JCT Deductible?
Net JCT Cost
✅ You are IOR via ACP
Pay ¥10M import JCT
Yes
Offset against sales JCT
❌ Third party is IOR
They pay ¥10M
No — you can't deduct
¥10M/yr unrecoverable
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 💡 BOTTOM LINE │
│ │
│ On ¥100M annual imports: │
│ │
│ ✅ ACP route → Save ¥10,000,000/year in JCT │
│ ❌ Old IOR route → Lose ¥10,000,000/year permanently │
│ │
│ ACP service costs ~¥50,000–200,000/month │
│ ROI is overwhelming for any meaningful import volume │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
⚠️ Additionally, the non-resident IOR must appoint a JCT Tax Representative (消費税の納税管理人) and — if conducting B2B sales — register as a Qualified Invoice Issuer under the QIS system.
ACP vs. Full Incorporation — Decision Framework# When ACP Is Enough
Scenario
Why ACP Works
🧪 Market testing
Low commitment; validate demand before incorporating
🛒 E-commerce (Amazon FBA, Rakuten)
Import + sell without local entity
📦 Contractual fulfillment
Ship goods to JP customers from abroad
📊 Low-volume imports
Entity overhead not justified
⏱️ Speed needed
3–4 weeks vs. 3–6 months for entity
When You Need an Entity
Scenario
Why Entity Is Better
👥 Permanent employees
Need legal employer (or use EOR as bridge)
🏦 Banking / licensing
Some activities require JP entity
🛂 Visa required
Business Manager or HSP visa needs operational entity
📈 Scaling beyond testing
Lower per-unit overhead at volume
🏷️ Brand presence
Entity provides JP address, local credibility
💊 Regulated products
Some licenses require JP entity as holder
The Hybrid Timeline PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3
Months 1–12 Months 12–24 Year 2+
┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐
│ ACP + Non-Res IOR│ │ Incorporate KK/GK│ │ Full entity ops │
│ EOR for hires │ ───→ │ Transfer to │ ───→ │ ACP no longer │
│ Market validation│ │ entity as IOR │ │ needed │
│ Low cost / risk │ │ Hire directly │ │ Scale operations │
└──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘
Risks of Getting It Wrong#
Risk
Consequence
🚫 Goods held at customs
Storage charges, delivery delays, spoilage
🔍 Post-clearance audit (事後調査)
Additional duties + JCT + penalties on years of history
💸 Unrecoverable JCT
Permanent 10% cost on every import
⚖️ Customs Act penalties
Fines for false declarations, undervaluation, record failures
🏴 Reputational damage
Non-compliant importers flagged for enhanced scrutiny
Choosing an ACP Provider — Checklist#
Criterion
Why It Matters
✅ Certified Customs Specialist (通関士) on staff
Professional credential = customs law expertise
✅ Integrated ACP + JCT Tax Rep
Single provider for customs + tax = no compliance gaps
✅ Multilingual (EN/JP/CN minimum)
Cross-border communication efficiency
✅ Regulated product experience
PSE/PSC, Food Sanitation, Radio Act, cosmetics
✅ Track record (50+ clients)
Proven ACP registration and clearance history
✅ Advance ruling capability
Can apply for binding HS, valuation, origin rulings
✅ Transparent pricing
Monthly fee + per-declaration fee clearly defined
Regulatory Timeline#
Date
Event
Impact
Oct 2023
IOR definition clarified
Third-party IOR model effectively ended
Oct 2023
Qualified Invoice System launched
JCT input credits require registered invoices
2024
ACP automatic duty payment via bank
Streamlined payment for non-residents
Oct 2025
Business Manager visa reform (¥30M)
Full entity entry more expensive → ACP more attractive for testing
See also: IOR & EOR in Japan — Enter the Market Without an Entity →
Aplash Services
Need a compliant Japan import structure?
Aplash acts as your Attorney for Customs Procedures (ACP) so your company can import in its own name without a Japan entity.
Explore ACP (Trade) → Official References#
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, customs, or tax advice. Consult a certified customs specialist (通関士), licensed tax accountant (税理士), or attorney (弁護士) for your specific situation.
Work With Aplash Import in your own name with an ACP Structure recurring Japan imports with Aplash's Attorney for Customs Procedures (ACP) service.
Request a Private Assessment → Explore ACP (Trade) → Confidential assessment · Response within one business day